Apache License, Version 1.1
Also known as Apache 1.1, Apache License 1.1, Apache License Version 1.1, Apache Version 1.1.
- Commercial use
- allowed
- Share alike
- not required
- Attribution
- required (keep the copyright and license notices)
Write this as a license text (needs an account) DALICC reads the model above and writes what it permits, requires and prohibits in plain English. Without an account, the Text download above writes the model out from the vocabulary.
Permissions
-
Change license by library convention Library convention: family rule 15: Permissive records permit relicensing. Replacing the license of the work, or of an adaptation, with another license, or changing its terms.
Duties
- Use a compliant license by library convention Library convention: family rule 15: Permissive records permit relicensing. Choosing a replacement license that stays compliant with the terms of the original license.
-
Charge distribution fee from the text Charging a fee for the act of providing a copy of the work to someone else.
-
Commercial use from the text Using the work to generate income, directly or indirectly, for example by selling it or by using it in advertising.
-
Derivative works from the text Distributing an adaptation of the work and making it available to the public.
-
Derive from the text Creating a new work from the work, such as a translation, adaptation or arrangement of it or of a part of it.
Duties
- Attribution from the text Giving credit to the copyright holders or authors of the work, in the form the licensor asks for.
- Modification notice from the text Marking a changed work as changed, saying how it differs from the original and keeping earlier notices of change.
- Notice from the text The text says: "Redistributions of source code must retain the above copyright notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer." Notice: keeping the license and copyright notices with every copy.
-
Duties
- Attribution from the text Giving credit to the copyright holders or authors of the work, in the form the licensor asks for.
- Notice from the text The text says: "Redistributions of source code must retain the above copyright notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer." Notice: keeping the license and copyright notices with every copy.
-
Modified works from the text Distributing a modified version of the work that does not amount to a new, derivative work.
-
Modify from the text Altering the work, for example by updating it, without creating a new work; an alteration that creates a new work is Derive.
Duties
- Attribution from the text Giving credit to the copyright holders or authors of the work, in the form the licensor asks for.
- Modification notice from the text Marking a changed work as changed, saying how it differs from the original and keeping earlier notices of change.
- Notice from the text The text says: "Redistributions of source code must retain the above copyright notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer." Notice: keeping the license and copyright notices with every copy.
- Rename from the text Giving a modified or derived work a name that tells it apart from the original.
-
Present from the text Performing the work in public, including by broadcast or other communication to the public.
Prohibitions
-
Promote from the text Not permitted: Promote. Using the name or trademarks of the licensor or of contributors to endorse or promote a product.
License-wide duties
This license states no duties that apply to the work as a whole.
What applies by default
The statements above are the library's reading of this license: each is marked with the sentence it rests on, or as a library convention where the text is not explicit. The statements below are the ones the DALICC reasoner supplies for acts the license says nothing about, from the default rules of the dependency graph it reasons with. Each one names the legal source it rests on. None of it is in the record.
No default rule of that graph reaches this license: it speaks about every act the rules are about.
Clauses
Additional clauses
Products derived from this software may not be called "Apache", nor may "Apache" appear in their name, without prior written permission of the Apache Software Foundation.
Promotion specification
This product includes software developed by the Apache Group for use in the Apache HTTP server project (http://www.apache.org/)
Info
- Target asset types
- Creative work (i.e. text, picture, sound, movie), Dataset, Software
- Region / jurisdiction
- Worldwide
- Validity
- Perpetual
- Source
- http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-1.1
- Legal code
- http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-1.1
- This description is published under
- Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International
- Publisher
- The Apache Software Foundation
- Attribution name
- The Apache Software Foundation
- SPDX identifier
-
Apache-1.1on the SPDX license list - DALICC identifier
Apache-1.1
This record is published under CC BY 4.0. Credit it as: DALICC License Library, DALICC - Verein zur Förderung der Rechtssicherheit in der Datenbewirtschaftung, https://dalicc.net, CC BY 4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). The license it describes belongs to its publisher.
Use this license
Everything below is generated from this record. Replace the example address with the address of your own work.
JSON sidecar
{
"license-uri": "https://dalicc.net/licenselibrary/Apache-1.1",
"license-title": "Apache License, Version 1.1",
"spdx-id": "Apache-1.1",
"attribution": "Copyright (c) [year] [copyright holder]",
"asset": null,
"generated-by": "DALICC"
}
RDF, Turtle
@prefix cc: <http://creativecommons.org/ns#> .
<https://example.org/my-work>
cc:license <https://dalicc.net/licenselibrary/Apache-1.1> .
RDF, JSON-LD
{
"@context": {
"cc": "http://creativecommons.org/ns#"
},
"@id": "https://example.org/my-work",
"cc:license": {
"@id": "https://dalicc.net/licenselibrary/Apache-1.1"
}
}
HTML attribution
<p>This work is licensed under <a href="https://dalicc.net/licenselibrary/Apache-1.1" rel="license">Apache License, Version 1.1</a>.</p>
This license asks for attribution, so the credit line is part of it.
Badge
Markdown
[](https://dalicc.net/license-library/Apache-1.1)
HTML
<a href="https://dalicc.net/license-library/Apache-1.1"><img src="https://dalicc.net/license-library/Apache-1.1/badge.svg" alt="License: Apache License, Version 1.1"></a>
Review
- Status
- Reviewed against the license text
- Last checked
- 2026-09-15
- Reviewer
- Giray Havur
- Verdict
- corrected during the review
- Record changed since this review
- yes (version 2, 2026-09-24)
- Findings
- 6 recorded, 2 applied to the record, 2 proposed
The record models the 1.1 license as a BSD-style permissive license with an acknowledgement clause and two name restrictions. dalicc:PromotionSpecification holds the acknowledgement of clause 3, dalicc:additionalClauses the naming restriction of clause 5, and dalicc:promote is prohibited for clause 4. The notice duty was attached to distribution only, although clauses 1 and 2 apply to every redistribution "with or without modification".
6 findings
-
major Rubric 5
odrl:dutyappliedClause 1 reads: "Redistributions of source code must retain the above copyright notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer", and the whole condition block is introduced by "Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without modification, are permitted provided that the following conditions are met". The cc:Notice duty was on odrl:distribute only. Added it to odrl:modify and odrl:derive.
-
info Rubric 4
odrl:prohibitionnonedalicc:promote is prohibited and clause 4 supports it: "The names \"Apache\" and \"Apache Software Foundation\" must not be used to endorse or promote products derived from this software without prior written permission."
-
info Rubric 5
odrl:dutyproposeddalicc:rename on odrl:modify is supported by clause 5: "Products derived from this software may not be called \"Apache\" nor may \"Apache\" appear in their name". It is not attached to odrl:derive, where the same clause applies.
-
info Rubric 8
vocabularynoneVersion 1.1 grants no patent rights and has no patent retaliation clause. That is the substantive difference from version 2.0 and it is invisible in the model, because neither record can express a patent grant. See the Apache-2.0 record.
-
minor Rubric 2
odrl:targetproposedThe asset collection lists dalicc:CreativeWork and dcmitype:Dataset next to dcmitype:Software. The 1.1 text speaks only of software and its documentation.
-
major Rubric 10
recordappliedStandard-license addition of 2026-09-15, decision 9: the record was corrected against its new siblings and versioned. The review's finding on family consistency: cc:attributionName and dct:publisher both began with a space.
Report an issue The review record as JSON The review checks the model against the license text. It is not legal advice.
History
This license model has 2 versions. Version 2 is the one served today; every earlier version keeps its own address, so a conclusion drawn from one of them can still be checked against it.
-
Version 2 current2026-09-24 Giray Havur
The content review of 2026-09-15 changed 2 permissions, recorded the relation to the record this one was adapted from and recorded the review state. Later changes brought it in line with its family and its text in the verification of 2026-09-15, recorded which sentence of the text each statement rests on and named the license the record itself is published under.
View version 2 JSON-LD Turtle RDF/XML
12 changes
-
added
dalicc:reviewStatus dalicc:ReviewedReview state Every record records how far it has come in the editorial workflow and when it was last checked against the legal text.
-
added
dalicc:reviewedOn "2026-09-15"^^xsd:dateReview state Every record records how far it has come in the editorial workflow and when it was last checked against the legal text.
-
added
dalicc:variantKind "version"Port relation The 2026-09-15 review made the relation between a jurisdiction port and the record it was adapted from explicit in the data.
-
changed
permission odrl:derive with duties [cc:Attribution, cc:Notice, dalicc:modificationNotice]was
permission odrl:derive with duties [cc:Attribution, dalicc:modificationNotice]Review finding Clause 1 reads: "Redistributions of source code must retain the above copyright notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer", and the whole condition block is introduced by "Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without modification, are permitted provided that the following conditions are met". The cc:Notice duty was on odrl:distribute only. Added it to odrl:modify and odrl:derive.
-
changed
permission odrl:modify with duties [cc:Attribution, cc:Notice, dalicc:modificationNotice, dalicc:rename]was
permission odrl:modify with duties [cc:Attribution, dalicc:modificationNotice, dalicc:rename]Review finding Clause 1 reads: "Redistributions of source code must retain the above copyright notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer", and the whole condition block is introduced by "Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without modification, are permitted provided that the following conditions are met". The cc:Notice duty was on odrl:distribute only. Added it to odrl:modify and odrl:derive.
-
changed
cc:attributionName "The Apache Software Foundation"was
cc:attributionName " The Apache Software Foundation"Manual edit The review's finding on family consistency: cc:attributionName and dct:publisher both began with a space.
-
changed
dct:publisher "The Apache Software Foundation"was
dct:publisher " The Apache Software Foundation"Manual edit The review's finding on family consistency: cc:attributionName and dct:publisher both began with a space.
-
changed
permission dalicc:ChangeLicense with duties [dalicc:compliantLicense]was
permission dalicc:ChangeLicense with duties [dalicc:compliantLicense]Manual edit The statement is marked as a library convention, family rule 15: Permissive records permit relicensing: the text does not state it in as many words. Its duty dalicc:compliantLicense is marked as a library convention, family rule 15: Permissive records permit relicensing.
-
changed
permission odrl:derive with duties [cc:Attribution, cc:Notice, dalicc:modificationNotice]was
permission odrl:derive with duties [cc:Attribution, cc:Notice, dalicc:modificationNotice]Manual edit Its duty cc:Notice quotes "Redistributions of source code must retain the above copyright notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer."
-
changed
permission odrl:distribute with duties [cc:Attribution, cc:Notice]was
permission odrl:distribute with duties [cc:Attribution, cc:Notice]Manual edit Its duty cc:Notice quotes "Redistributions of source code must retain the above copyright notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer."
-
changed
permission odrl:modify with duties [cc:Attribution, cc:Notice, dalicc:modificationNotice, dalicc:rename]was
permission odrl:modify with duties [cc:Attribution, cc:Notice, dalicc:modificationNotice, dalicc:rename]Manual edit Its duty cc:Notice quotes "Redistributions of source code must retain the above copyright notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer."
-
added
dct:license <https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/>Manual edit Every record is published under CC BY 4.0. cc:license names the record DALICC keeps of that licence; dct:license now names it by the address Creative Commons publishes it at, so that a consumer matching the canonical IRI finds it.
-
-
Version 1
The version this model had before the content review of 2026-09-15.
Every change names the reason behind it: a finding of the content review, one of its library-wide decisions, the metadata that review wrote onto every record, or a hand edit. None of it is legal advice.
Nothing on this page is legal advice. What a license means is decided by its text; ask a legal advisor before you rely on it.