GNU General Public License v3.0 or later with Autoconf exception 3.0
Also known as GNU General Public License v3.0 or later with Autoconf exception 3.0, GPL-3.0+ with Autoconf exception, GPL-3.0-or-later WITH Autoconf-exception-3.0, GPL-3.0-or-later-with-Autoconf-exception-3.0, GPLv3 or later with Autoconf exception.
- Commercial use
- allowed
- Share alike
- required
- Attribution
- required (keep the copyright and license notices)
Write this as a license text (needs an account) DALICC reads the model above and writes what it permits, requires and prohibits in plain English. Without an account, the Text download above writes the model out from the vocabulary.
Permissions
-
Charge distribution fee from the text Charging a fee for the act of providing a copy of the work to someone else.
-
Commercial use from the text Using the work to generate income, directly or indirectly, for example by selling it or by using it in advertising.
-
Derivative works from the text Distributing an adaptation of the work and making it available to the public.
-
Derive from the text Creating a new work from the work, such as a translation, adaptation or arrangement of it or of a part of it.
Duties
- Attribution from the text Giving credit to the copyright holders or authors of the work, in the form the licensor asks for.
- Modification notice from the text The text says: "The work must carry prominent notices stating that you modified it, and giving a relevant date." Marking a changed work as changed, saying how it differs from the original and keeping earlier notices of change.
- Notice from the text Notice: keeping the license and copyright notices with every copy.
- Source code from the text Providing access to the source code of the work with every copy distributed.
-
Duties
- Attribution from the text Giving credit to the copyright holders or authors of the work, in the form the licensor asks for.
- Notice from the text Notice: keeping the license and copyright notices with every copy.
- Source code from the text Providing access to the source code of the work with every copy distributed.
-
Excepted combination from the text Combining or linking the covered work with the material an exception names and conveying the result without the condition the exception lifts.
-
Modified works from the text Distributing a modified version of the work that does not amount to a new, derivative work.
-
Modify from the text Altering the work, for example by updating it, without creating a new work; an alteration that creates a new work is Derive.
Duties
- Attribution from the text Giving credit to the copyright holders or authors of the work, in the form the licensor asks for.
- Modification notice from the text The text says: "The work must carry prominent notices stating that you modified it, and giving a relevant date." Marking a changed work as changed, saying how it differs from the original and keeping earlier notices of change.
- Notice from the text Notice: keeping the license and copyright notices with every copy.
- Source code from the text Providing access to the source code of the work with every copy distributed.
-
Patent grant from the text Granting a license under the patent claims that a contributor holds and that the contribution necessarily infringes.
-
Present from the text Performing the work in public, including by broadcast or other communication to the public.
-
Reproduce from the text The text says: "You may charge any price or no price for each copy that you convey, and you may offer support or warranty protection for a fee." Making copies of the work in any form.
Prohibitions
-
Change license from the text Not permitted: Change license. Replacing the license of the work, or of an adaptation, with another license, or changing its terms.
License-wide duties
-
Share alike from the text The text says: "You must license the entire work, as a whole, under this License to anyone who comes into possession of a copy." Adaptations have to be licensed under the same license or one the license names as compatible.
What applies by default
The statements above are the library's reading of this license: each is marked with the sentence it rests on, or as a library convention where the text is not explicit. The statements below are the ones the DALICC reasoner supplies for acts the license says nothing about, from the default rules of the dependency graph it reasons with. Each one names the legal source it rests on. None of it is in the record.
-
Promote by default rule (adopted) Using the name or trademarks of the licensor or of contributors to endorse or promote a product.
This license says nothing about Promote, and the graph applies this reading in all jurisdictions it covers: it is not permitted unless the license permits it.
A licence that says nothing about endorsement is read as not allowing it: the licence gives the licensee no right to use the licensor's name or marks in a way that states or implies that the licensor endorses the licensee or its product, while stating truthfully that a work is based on or uses the licensed work is a different act that this rule does not decide. A copyright licence grants rights in the work, and the right to use a name or a trademark is a separate right under trademark law and the protection of names, which a silent copyright licence does not pass on. Combining a licence that is silent about endorsement with one that permits it shows a conflict marked as coming from this rule.
Basis Trademark and name rights are separate from copyright: Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 article 9 lets the proprietor of an EU trade mark prevent all third parties not having his consent from using the sign in the course of trade, and Directive (EU) 2015/2436 article 10, 15 U.S.C. 1114 and 1125(a), section 12 BGB and section 43 ABGB protect marks and names in the same way. The library's evidence is Creative Commons 4.0 section 2(b)(2): Patent and trademark rights are not licensed under this Public License. A copyright licence that is silent grants no right to use the licensor's name or marks to suggest endorsement (Worldwide)
Further terms
These are the things the license says about itself beyond the acts it permits, forbids and requires: when it ends, how long there is to put a breach right, which law governs it, and so on. A term that comes from the DALICC vocabulary links to its definition.
- Cure period
- 30 days
- Or later version option
- Yes
- Reciprocity scope
- the Covered Code of Autoconf, not its output
- Terminates on breach
- Yes
Clauses
Warranty disclaimer
THERE IS NO WARRANTY FOR THE PROGRAM, TO THE EXTENT PERMITTED BY APPLICABLE LAW. EXCEPT WHEN OTHERWISE STATED IN WRITING THE COPYRIGHT HOLDERS AND/OR OTHER PARTIES PROVIDE THE PROGRAM “AS IS” WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND, EITHER EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, THE IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. THE ENTIRE RISK AS TO THE QUALITY AND PERFORMANCE OF THE PROGRAM IS WITH YOU. SHOULD THE PROGRAM PROVE DEFECTIVE, YOU ASSUME THE COST OF ALL NECESSARY SERVICING, REPAIR OR CORRECTION.
Limitation of liability
IN NO EVENT UNLESS REQUIRED BY APPLICABLE LAW OR AGREED TO IN WRITING WILL ANY COPYRIGHT HOLDER, OR ANY OTHER PARTY WHO MODIFIES AND/OR CONVEYS THE PROGRAM AS PERMITTED ABOVE, BE LIABLE TO YOU FOR DAMAGES, INCLUDING ANY GENERAL, SPECIAL, INCIDENTAL OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES ARISING OUT OF THE USE OR INABILITY TO USE THE PROGRAM (INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO LOSS OF DATA OR DATA BEING RENDERED INACCURATE OR LOSSES SUSTAINED BY YOU OR THIRD PARTIES OR A FAILURE OF THE PROGRAM TO OPERATE WITH ANY OTHER PROGRAMS), EVEN IF SUCH HOLDER OR OTHER PARTY HAS BEEN ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGES.
Accepting warranty or additional liability
you may offer support or warranty protection for a fee
Additional clauses
AUTOCONF CONFIGURE SCRIPT EXCEPTION Version 3.0, 18 August 2009 Copyright © 2009 Free Software Foundation, Inc. <http://fsf.org/> Everyone is permitted to copy and distribute verbatim copies of this license document, but changing it is not allowed. This Exception is an additional permission under section 7 of the GNU General Public License, version 3 ("GPLv3"). It applies to a given file that bears a notice placed by the copyright holder of the file stating that the file is governed by GPLv3 along with this Exception. The purpose of this Exception is to allow distribution of Autoconf's typical output under terms of the recipient's choice (including proprietary). 0. Definitions. "Covered Code" is the source or object code of a version of Autoconf that is a covered work under this License. "Normally Copied Code" for a version of Autoconf means all parts of its Covered Code which that version can copy from its code (i.e., not from its input file) into its minimally verbose, non-debugging and non-tracing output. "Ineligible Code" is Covered Code that is not Normally Copied Code. 1. Grant of Additional Permission. You have permission to propagate output of Autoconf, even if such propagation would otherwise violate the terms of GPLv3. However, if by modifying Autoconf you cause any Ineligible Code of the version you received to become Normally Copied Code of your modified version, then you void this Exception for the resulting covered work. If you convey that resulting covered work, you must remove this Exception in accordance with the second paragraph of Section 7 of GPLv3. 2. No Weakening of Autoconf Copyleft. The availability of this Exception does not imply any general presumption that third-party software is unaffected by the copyleft requirements of the license of Autoconf.
Info
- Target asset types
- Software
- Region / jurisdiction
- Worldwide
- Validity
- Perpetual
- Source
- https://spdx.org/licenses/Autoconf-exception-3.0.html
- Legal code
- https://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-3.0.html
- This description is published under
- Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International
- Publisher
- Free Software Foundation
- SPDX identifier
-
GPL-3.0-or-later WITH Autoconf-exception-3.0on the SPDX license list - Version
- 3.0
- DALICC identifier
GPL-3.0-or-later-with-Autoconf-exception-3.0
This record is published under CC BY 4.0. Credit it as: DALICC License Library, DALICC - Verein zur Förderung der Rechtssicherheit in der Datenbewirtschaftung, https://dalicc.net, CC BY 4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). The license it describes belongs to its publisher.
Use this license
Everything below is generated from this record. Replace the example address with the address of your own work.
JSON sidecar
{
"license-uri": "https://dalicc.net/licenselibrary/GPL-3.0-or-later-with-Autoconf-exception-3.0",
"license-title": "GNU General Public License v3.0 or later with Autoconf exception 3.0",
"spdx-id": "GPL-3.0-or-later WITH Autoconf-exception-3.0",
"attribution": "Copyright (c) [year] [copyright holder]",
"asset": null,
"generated-by": "DALICC"
}
RDF, Turtle
@prefix cc: <http://creativecommons.org/ns#> .
<https://example.org/my-work>
cc:license <https://dalicc.net/licenselibrary/GPL-3.0-or-later-with-Autoconf-exception-3.0> .
RDF, JSON-LD
{
"@context": {
"cc": "http://creativecommons.org/ns#"
},
"@id": "https://example.org/my-work",
"cc:license": {
"@id": "https://dalicc.net/licenselibrary/GPL-3.0-or-later-with-Autoconf-exception-3.0"
}
}
HTML attribution
<p>This work is licensed under <a href="https://dalicc.net/licenselibrary/GPL-3.0-or-later-with-Autoconf-exception-3.0" rel="license">GNU General Public License v3.0 or later with Autoconf exception 3.0</a>.</p>
This license asks for attribution, so the credit line is part of it.
Badge
Markdown
[](https://dalicc.net/license-library/GPL-3.0-or-later-with-Autoconf-exception-3.0)
HTML
<a href="https://dalicc.net/license-library/GPL-3.0-or-later-with-Autoconf-exception-3.0"><img src="https://dalicc.net/license-library/GPL-3.0-or-later-with-Autoconf-exception-3.0/badge.svg" alt="License: GNU General Public License v3.0 or later with Autoconf exception 3.0"></a>
Review
- Written from the license text by
- Giray Havur
- Written on
- 2026-09-22
- Second review
- not yet done
- Record changed since this review
- yes (version 2, 2026-09-24)
- Findings
- 16 recorded, 15 applied to the record, 0 proposed
The record models GPL version 3 or later with the Autoconf configure script exception 3.0, the combination GNU Autoconf carries. It keeps every statement of the GPL-3.0-or-later record and adds one permission for the output of Autoconf, which may be distributed under terms of the recipient's choice. The condition that voids the exception for a modified Autoconf has no term and is quoted.
16 findings
-
info Rubric 1
spdx:licenseIdappliedFile name, record identifier, IRI local name and title agree. spdx:licenseId carries the SPDX expression "GPL-3.0-or-later WITH Autoconf-exception-3.0": the base identifier, one space, WITH in capitals, one space, the exception identifier. No record in the library carried an expression before, so the SPDX mapping and the spdx route have to accept the space and the keyword.
-
info Rubric 1
cc:legalcodeappliedcc:legalcode points at the text of the base licence, https://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-3.0.html, because that is the licence the record models. dct:source points at the SPDX page of the exception, https://spdx.org/licenses/Autoconf-exception-3.0.html, because that is where the additional permission is published.
-
info Rubric 2
odrl:targetappliedodrl:target is the one the base record carries: an odrl:AssetCollection of dct:type dcmitype:Software. The exception is about program files, so nothing changes.
-
major Rubric 3
odrl:permissionappliedSection 1 of the exception reads: "You have permission to propagate output of Autoconf, even if such propagation would otherwise violate the terms of GPLv3." The purpose clause says what that is for: "The purpose of this Exception is to allow distribution of Autoconf's typical output under terms of the recipient's choice (including proprietary)." The output is material the licence conditions no longer reach, which is the permission dalicc:exceptedCombination.
-
info Rubric 3
odrl:permissionappliedEvery permission of GPL-3.0-or-later is kept, in the same place and with the same duties. An exception adds an additional permission to a licence; it never takes a granted right away.
-
info Rubric 4
odrl:prohibitionappliedThe exception lets the combined result travel under other terms, and the vocabulary cannot say that of a part of a work. The purpose clause says: "The purpose of this Exception is to allow distribution of Autoconf's typical output under terms of the recipient's choice (including proprietary)." A dalicc:ChangeLicense permission would say the licence of the covered work itself may be replaced, which is false and would contradict the whole-work share-alike duty. The record therefore keeps the prohibition, states the narrowed reach in dalicc:reciprocityScope and quotes the clause. Proposed term: dalicc:combinedWorkRelicensing, a permission for putting a larger work that contains the covered material under other terms.
-
info Rubric 5
odrl:dutyappliedThe licence-wide cc:ShareAlike duty stays on the odrl:Set, and section 2 of the exception says why: "The availability of this Exception does not imply any general presumption that third-party software is unaffected by the copyleft requirements of the license of Autoconf."
-
info Rubric 6
dalicc:additionalClausesappliedThe exception text is quoted verbatim as one literal, taken from https://raw.githubusercontent.com/spdx/license-list-data/main/text/Autoconf-exception-3.0.txt. Line breaks and the indentation of the source file are collapsed to single spaces, which is how every clause literal in the library is written; the wording is untouched. The warranty disclaimer and the liability limitation are the ones the base record quotes from the base licence.
-
info Rubric 7
cc:jurisdictionappliedcc:jurisdiction stays dalicc:worldwide and dalicc:validityType stays dalicc:perpetual: the exception names no territory and no term. The termination clause of the base licence still applies, and the record says no more about it than the base record does.
-
gap Rubric 8
dalicc:exceptedCombinationappliedThe exception carves the combination out of the condition of the licence, not out of its grant. dalicc:exemptedMaterial says the opposite and is prohibited on OGL-UK-1.0, OGL-UK-2.0 and NLOD-2.0, where it means material the licence never granted. The vocabulary defines dalicc:exceptedCombination for this side of it since 2026-09-23, and the record carries it as a permission.
-
gap Rubric 8
dalicc:additionalClausesnoneThe exception falls away when a modification changes what Autoconf copies into its output: "However, if by modifying Autoconf you cause any Ineligible Code of the version you received to become Normally Copied Code of your modified version, then you void this Exception for the resulting covered work." No term can hold a condition that ends an additional permission. Proposed term: dalicc:exceptionVoidingCondition.
-
info Rubric 9
recordappliedapp.services.composer.consistency_check with the default dependency graph reports 0 conflicts for this record. dalicc:exceptedCombination takes part in no dependency relation, so it neither creates nor hides one.
-
major Rubric 10
dalicc:variantOfappliedThe base record of this variant is GPL-3.0-or-later, which this same addition creates. The model is copied from it statement for statement, so dalicc:orLaterVersionOption stays true for the clause GPL version 3 section 14 states: "If the Program specifies a version number of this License which applies to it and "any later version", you have the option of following the terms and conditions either of that version or of any later version published by the Free Software Foundation." dalicc:variantOf points at GPL-3.0-or-later and not at GPL-3.0-only, although the two carry the same deontic model. Both records are new, so a second reader should read them together.
-
info Rubric 10
recordappliedThe nearest siblings are GPL-3.0-or-later, which this record copies, and GPL-2.0-or-later-with-Autoconf-exception-2.0, the older pair. Version 3.0 of the exception defines Covered Code, Normally Copied Code and Ineligible Code and hangs the permission on them, where version 2.0 simply names the configure scripts.
-
minor Rubric 4
odrl:prohibitionapplieddalicc:promote was prohibited and no sentence of this text supports it. The statement was the library's reading of a legal default, that a copyright licence which says nothing about endorsement grants no right to it, and it sat in 519 of 581 records as a house convention. That reading is now an adopted dalicc:DefaultRule of the core dependency graph, which supplies it to every licence that is silent about the action, so a compatibility check reaches the same answer and the record states only what the text states. Removed on 2026-09-23; see section 13 of docs/LICENSE_REVIEW.md.
-
minor Rubric 6
dalicc:WarrantyOrLiabilityAcceptanceapplieddalicc:WarrantyOrLiabilityAcceptance held the whole sentence of Section 4, "You may charge any price or no price for each copy that you convey, and you may offer support or warranty protection for a fee." Its first half is the permission to charge for a copy, which the record states as dalicc:chargeDistributionFee, and not a warranty clause. The literal now quotes only the second half, "you may offer support or warranty protection for a fee".
Report an issue The review record as JSON The review checks the model against the license text. It is not legal advice.
History
This license model has 2 versions. Version 2 is the one served today; every earlier version keeps its own address, so a conclusion drawn from one of them can still be checked against it.
-
Version 2 current2026-09-24 Giray Havur
The changes since version 1 left endorsement to the default rule of the core dependency graph, recorded which sentence of the text each statement rests on, corrected it against its text on 2026-09-24 and named the license the record itself is published under.
View version 2 JSON-LD Turtle RDF/XML
7 changes
-
removed
prohibition dalicc:promoteManual edit The endorsement prohibition rested on no sentence of the text; the default rule for endorsement now supplies it.
-
changed
duty cc:ShareAlikewas
duty cc:ShareAlikeManual edit The statement now quotes the sentence of the licence text it rests on: "You must license the entire work, as a whole, under this License to anyone who comes into possession of a copy."
-
changed
permission odrl:derive with duties [cc:Attribution, cc:Notice, cc:SourceCode, dalicc:modificationNotice]was
permission odrl:derive with duties [cc:Attribution, cc:Notice, cc:SourceCode, dalicc:modificationNotice]Manual edit Its duty dalicc:modificationNotice quotes "The work must carry prominent notices stating that you modified it, and giving a relevant date."
-
changed
permission odrl:modify with duties [cc:Attribution, cc:Notice, cc:SourceCode, dalicc:modificationNotice]was
permission odrl:modify with duties [cc:Attribution, cc:Notice, cc:SourceCode, dalicc:modificationNotice]Manual edit Its duty dalicc:modificationNotice quotes "The work must carry prominent notices stating that you modified it, and giving a relevant date."
-
changed
permission odrl:reproducewas
permission odrl:reproduceManual edit The statement now quotes the sentence of the licence text it rests on: "You may charge any price or no price for each copy that you convey, and you may offer support or warranty protection for a fee."
-
changed
dalicc:WarrantyOrLiabilityAcceptance "you may offer support or warranty protection for a fee"was
dalicc:WarrantyOrLiabilityAcceptance "You may charge any price or no price for each copy that you convey, and you may offer support or warranty protection for a fee."Manual edit The first half of the Section 4 sentence, "You may charge any price or no price for each copy that you convey", is the permission to charge for a copy, not a warranty clause.
-
added
dct:license <https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/>Manual edit Every record is published under CC BY 4.0. cc:license names the record DALICC keeps of that licence; dct:license now names it by the address Creative Commons publishes it at, so that a consumer matching the canonical IRI finds it.
-
-
Version 1
Created from the license text on 2026-09-22 (GNU copyleft family (GPL, LGPL, AGPL, FDL)).
Every change names the reason behind it: a finding of the content review, one of its library-wide decisions, the metadata that review wrote onto every record, or a hand edit. None of it is legal advice.
Nothing on this page is legal advice. What a license means is decided by its text; ask a legal advisor before you rely on it.