Intel Research Use License Agreement

Also known as Intel Research Use License, Intel-Research-Use-License, intel-research.

Commercial use: not allowed
Share alike: not required
Attribution: not required

Compare with… Add to the compatibility check Download JSON-LD Turtle RDF/XML Text

Write this as a license text (needs an account) DALICC reads the model above and writes what it permits, requires and prohibits in plain English. Without an account, the Text download above writes the model out from the vocabulary.

Canonical URI https://dalicc.net/licenselibrary/Intel-Research-Use-License

Permissions

Display from the text
Distribute from the text
Reproduce from the text

Prohibitions

Change license from the text
Commercial use from the text
Derivative works from the text
Derive from the text
Exempted material from the text
Modified works from the text
Modify from the text
Sublicense from the text

License-wide duties

This license states no duties that apply to the work as a whole.

What applies by default

The statements above are the library's reading of this license: each is marked with the sentence it rests on, or as a library convention where the text is not explicit. The statements below are the ones the DALICC reasoner supplies for acts the license says nothing about, from the default rules of the dependency graph it reasons with. Each one names the legal source it rests on. None of it is in the record.

Promote by default rule (adopted)

This license says nothing about Promote, and the graph applies this reading in all jurisdictions it covers: it is not permitted unless the license permits it.

A licence that says nothing about endorsement is read as not allowing it: the licence gives the licensee no right to use the licensor's name or marks in a way that states or implies that the licensor endorses the licensee or its product, while stating truthfully that a work is based on or uses the licensed work is a different act that this rule does not decide. A copyright licence grants rights in the work, and the right to use a name or a trademark is a separate right under trademark law and the protection of names, which a silent copyright licence does not pass on. Combining a licence that is silent about endorsement with one that permits it shows a conflict marked as coming from this rule.

Basis Trademark and name rights are separate from copyright: Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 article 9 lets the proprietor of an EU trade mark prevent all third parties not having his consent from using the sign in the course of trade, and Directive (EU) 2015/2436 article 10, 15 U.S.C. 1114 and 1125(a), section 12 BGB and section 43 ABGB protect marks and names in the same way. The library's evidence is Creative Commons 4.0 section 2(b)(2): Patent and trademark rights are not licensed under this Public License. A copyright licence that is silent grants no right to use the licensor's name or marks to suggest endorsement (Worldwide)

Further terms

These are the things the license says about itself beyond the acts it permits, forbids and requires: when it ends, how long there is to put a breach right, which law governs it, and so on. A term that comes from the DALICC vocabulary links to its definition.

Field of use restriction: research purposes
Governing law: the laws of the United States of America and the State of Delaware
Terminates on breach: Yes

Clauses

Warranty disclaimer

4. No Warranty. The Material is provided “as is,” without any express or implied warranty of any kind including warranties of merchantability, non-infringement, title, or fitness for a particular purpose. The Material may be pre-release and may not be fully functional. Intel is not required to maintain, update, or support any Material. You are solely responsible for determining the appropriateness of using or distributing the Material and assume any risks associated with Your use of the Material.

Limitation of liability

5. Limitation on Liability. IN NO EVENT WILL INTEL BE LIABLE TO YOU UNDER ANY THEORY OF LIABILITY FOR ANY LOST PROFITS OR DAMAGES (INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO DIRECT, INDIRECT, SPECULATIVE, SPECIAL OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES) WHATSOEVER ARISING OUT OF OR IN CONNECTION WITH THIS AGREEMENT (EVEN IF INTEL HAS BEEN ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH LOSSES OR DAMAGES).

Additional clauses

By using or distributing any portion or element of the Material, You agree to be bound by this Agreement.

Info

Target asset types: Dataset, Software
Region / jurisdiction: Worldwide
Validity: Perpetual
Source: https://scancode-licensedb.aboutcode.org/intel-research-use-2024.LICENSE
Legal code: https://scancode-licensedb.aboutcode.org/intel-research-use-2024.LICENSE
This description is published under: Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International
Publisher: Intel Corporation
SPDX identifier: intel-research (provisional, the record declares none)
DALICC identifier: Intel-Research-Use-License

This record is published under CC BY 4.0. Credit it as: DALICC License Library, DALICC - Verein zur Förderung der Rechtssicherheit in der Datenbewirtschaftung, https://dalicc.net, CC BY 4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). The license it describes belongs to its publisher.

Use this license

Everything below is generated from this record. Replace the example address with the address of your own work.

JSON sidecar

{
  "license-uri": "https://dalicc.net/licenselibrary/Intel-Research-Use-License",
  "license-title": "Intel Research Use License Agreement",
  "spdx-id": null,
  "asset": null,
  "generated-by": "DALICC"
}

RDF, Turtle

@prefix cc: <http://creativecommons.org/ns#> .

<https://example.org/my-work>
    cc:license <https://dalicc.net/licenselibrary/Intel-Research-Use-License> .

RDF, JSON-LD

{
  "@context": {
    "cc": "http://creativecommons.org/ns#"
  },
  "@id": "https://example.org/my-work",
  "cc:license": {
    "@id": "https://dalicc.net/licenselibrary/Intel-Research-Use-License"
  }
}

This license carries no attribution duty, so no credit line is offered here.

Badge

Markdown

[![License: Intel Research Use License Agreement](https://dalicc.net/license-library/Intel-Research-Use-License/badge.svg)](https://dalicc.net/license-library/Intel-Research-Use-License)

HTML

<a href="https://dalicc.net/license-library/Intel-Research-Use-License"><img src="https://dalicc.net/license-library/Intel-Research-Use-License/badge.svg" alt="License: Intel Research Use License Agreement"></a>

Review

Written from the license text by: Giray Havur
Written on: 2026-09-22
Second review: not yet done
Record changed since this review: yes (version 2, 2026-09-24)
Findings: 12 recorded, 7 applied to the record, 0 proposed

A narrow research licence over datasets, model weights and other software. You may use, reproduce, display and distribute the material for research purposes and nothing else, and the agreement says in terms that any other use is withheld. The record is the most restrictive of this family: it permits three acts, prohibits the rest expressly, and carries no duty at all because the text asks for no notice and no attribution.

12 findings

info Rubric 1 dct:title applied

File name, record identifier and IRI local name agree. The licence has no SPDX identifier, so no spdx:licenseId triple is written. dct:title is the heading of the document; the short form and the model-hub tag are in dct:alternative.
major Rubric 2 odrl:target applied

dcmitype:Dataset and dcmitype:Software. The definition is express: "'Material' means datasets, model weights or other software Intel makes available to you under this Agreement."
major Rubric 3 odrl:permission applied

Section 2 grants "a limited, non-transferable, non-sublicensable, non-exclusive, worldwide, royalty-free, license under Intel's copyrights in the Material, to use, reproduce, display, and distribute the Material solely for research purposes." That is odrl:reproduce, odrl:display and odrl:distribute, and nothing more. odrl:present is not written: the text says display, not perform.
major Rubric 4 odrl:prohibition applied

Section 2.1 reads "Except as authorized above, You will not: (a) use Material in any other way; (b) reverse engineer, decompile, or disassemble the Material, or (c) use Material to violate or aid in the violation of any international human right." Because the grant is closed, the acts it does not name are prohibited rather than merely absent: odrl:modify, odrl:derive, cc:DerivativeWorks, dalicc:ModifiedWorks and cc:CommercialUse, the last from "solely for research purposes". dalicc:sublicense is prohibited from "non-sublicensable". dalicc:ChangeLicense is prohibited because the agreement binds every user of the material by its own terms: "By using or distributing any portion or element of the Material, You agree to be bound by this Agreement." dalicc:exemptedMaterial is prohibited from section 3: "Your use of certain third-party software with or within the Material is subject to your compliance with licensing you obtain directly from that third-party."
major Rubric 5 odrl:duty applied

The record carries no duty, licence-wide or on an act. The text asks for no copyright notice, no attribution line, no copy of the agreement and no modification note, and none was invented. This makes the record one of the few in the library with neither cc:Attribution nor cc:Notice; the review proposes that the consolidation add the identifier to the list of records that rule 6 of the family rules exempts.
minor Rubric 6 dalicc:WarrantyDisclaimer applied

Section 4 goes to dalicc:WarrantyDisclaimer and section 5 to dalicc:LiabilityLimitation, each whole and verbatim. dalicc:additionalClauses carries the acceptance sentence, the definitions, the licence grant, the restrictions, the no-implied- licence clause, the third-party clause, the term and termination clause and the governing- law clause. Curly quotation marks in the source are kept; no long dash appears in the text.
minor Rubric 7 cc:jurisdiction applied

cc:jurisdiction is dalicc:worldwide, from the "worldwide" grant, and dalicc:governingLaw names the law the agreement chooses: "All disputes will be governed by the laws of the United States of America and the State of Delaware without reference to conflict of law principles". dalicc:validityType is dalicc:perpetual, because the term runs from acceptance until terminated rather than for a fixed period, and dalicc:terminatesOnBreach is true from "Intel may terminate this Agreement if You are in breach of any term or condition of this Agreement." No cure period is given.
gap Rubric 8 dalicc:fieldOfUseRestriction none

"solely for research purposes" is a field of use the vocabulary cannot carry as an action. The literal names the field and the clause is quoted; the proposed term is dalicc:researchUseOnly, a duty action beside dalicc:computationalUseOnly. The same proposal covers two other records of this family.
gap Rubric 8 dalicc:additionalClauses none

Clause 2.1(c), "use Material to violate or aid in the violation of any international human right", is a use restriction of the kind the responsible-use licences of this family put in an attachment. No term expresses a named prohibited use. Quoted; the proposed term is dalicc:prohibitedUsePolicy, an annotation carrying the policy or the list the licence applies.
gap Rubric 8 dalicc:additionalClauses none

Section 6 names what survives termination: "Sections 4, 5 and 7 will survive the termination of this Agreement." dalicc:sublicenseSurvival says only whether granted sublicences survive, and there is no term for the clauses that do. Quoted; the proposed term is dalicc:survivingClauses, an annotation naming them.
info Rubric 9 record none

The consistency check of app.services.composer against dg_default returned an empty conflict list. The eight prohibitions and three permissions do not overlap, and none of the prohibited actions is implied by a permitted one in the dependency graph.
info Rubric 10 record none

Family: the narrowest of the three research-only records. Like the other two it prohibits cc:CommercialUse and names its field in dalicc:fieldOfUseRestriction, but it is the only one of the seventeen that withholds modification and derivative works, and the only one with no duty.

Report an issue The review record as JSON The review checks the model against the license text. It is not legal advice.

History

This license model has 2 versions. Version 2 is the one served today; every earlier version keeps its own address, so a conclusion drawn from one of them can still be checked against it.

Version 2 current2026-09-24 Giray Havur

The changes since version 1 recorded which sentence of the text each statement rests on and named the license the record itself is published under.

View version 2 JSON-LD Turtle RDF/XML
2 changes
- changed permission odrl:reproduce
  
  was permission odrl:reproduce
  
  Manual edit The statement now quotes the sentence of the licence text it rests on: "Intel grants to You, a limited, non-transferable, non-sublicensable, non-exclusive, worldwide, royalty-free, license under Intel’s copyrights in the Material, to use, reproduce, display, and distribute the Material solely for research purposes."
- added dct:license <https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/>
  
  Manual edit Every record is published under CC BY 4.0. cc:license names the record DALICC keeps of that licence; dct:license now names it by the address Creative Commons publishes it at, so that a consumer matching the canonical IRI finds it.
Version 1

Created from the license text on 2026-09-22 (Model licences).

View version 1 JSON-LD Turtle RDF/XML

Every change names the reason behind it: a finding of the content review, one of its library-wide decisions, the metadata that review wrote onto every record, or a hand edit. None of it is legal advice.

Nothing on this page is legal advice. What a license means is decided by its text; ask a legal advisor before you rely on it.